|
Wild At Heart -- John Eldridge |
|
|
Written by Mike Noel
|
|
Tuesday, 15 June 2004 |
There are a few reasons that will compel me to read a book more than once. A good story or interesting characters are not enough. Although, usually those qualities will lead me to read other books by the same author. Sometimes I'll read a story and it just grabs me. It will resonate within me and encourage me to make a better life. Somehow the book is able to talk to my soul and heart. The Tolkien books are an example of this. These I will re-read.
Sometimes this happens in non-fiction as well. And with non-fiction there's usually the added fact that I know there's more material in the book than I got the first time. I look forward to re-reading these because I anticipate learning and growing.
Wild At Heart by John Eldridge is a book in that second category. Man, the male version, in modern society is only a weak, pale reflection of what God meant for him to be. This is Eldridge's point. Society has worked hard for the last couple of hundred years to "civilize" males but now maybe we're not all that happy with that. Men are generally unfufilled. Bill Murray's character in Lost In Translation comes to mind. Women are generally lonely and dissatisfied with the man they end up with. Why? Eldridge says it's cause men are not being "wild" as they were intended to be.
|
The whole philosophy is boiled down to three components for a man's life: a battle to fight, an adventure to live, a beauty to win. Eldridge describes each of these components and explains how God has built these into men and how the lack of these things leads to the kind of man we see now. He points out often that people don't want James Bond to be a "nice guy". They want him to be a hero. Someone who is tough, strong, protecting.
One could jump to the conclusion that Eldridge is just a chest beating macho hound. That would be wrong. Strength is not just a physical thing. Strength of will and character are just as real and important.
My personal view on the book is very positive. I have read it twice now and expect to read it again. There is much in the book that I don't understand but I look forward to digging into it again soon.
|
|
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 30 December 2008 )
|